Whether a supplier failed to deliver, a contractor did substandard work, or a business partner simply did not honour what they agreed to, discovering a breach of contract raises two immediate questions: what can you actually do about it, and how long do you have to act? This guide walks through the remedies available for breach of contract in Singapore, and the time limits that apply.
What Counts as a Breach of Contract
A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform an obligation set out in a valid, binding contract, whether by not performing at all, performing late, or performing in a way that does not meet the agreed standard. Breaches can range from relatively minor, technical failures to breaches so fundamental they undermine the entire purpose of the agreement.
Minor Versus Fundamental Breaches
Not every breach carries the same legal consequences. A minor breach, sometimes called a breach of warranty, generally entitles the wronged party to claim damages, but does not release them from their own remaining obligations under the contract. A more serious breach, going to the very root of the contract, can entitle the wronged party to treat the contract as discharged entirely, meaning they are released from further performance, in addition to claiming damages for the loss caused.
The Primary Remedy: Damages
Damages, a monetary award compensating the wronged party for their loss, are the most commonly sought remedy for breach of contract. The general aim is to put the wronged party, as far as money reasonably can, in the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed. This is often referred to as putting the claimant in their “expectation” position, reflecting what they had a legitimate right to expect from the deal.
Limits on What Damages Can Cover
Damages are not unlimited. They must be a genuinely foreseeable consequence of the breach, meaning losses that were either an obvious, natural result of the breach, or losses the breaching party specifically knew or should have known were likely given the particular circumstances at the time the contract was made. The wronged party also has a duty to mitigate their loss, meaning they must take reasonable steps to minimise the damage suffered, rather than allowing losses to accumulate unnecessarily when reasonable action could have reduced them.
Liquidated Damages Clauses
Many commercial contracts include a liquidated damages clause, a pre-agreed sum payable in the event of a specific breach, commonly used in construction and supply contracts to address delay. These clauses are generally enforceable provided they represent a genuine, reasonable pre-estimate of likely loss, rather than functioning as a penalty designed simply to punish the breaching party, since penalty clauses of this kind are not enforceable under Singapore law.
Specific Performance: Compelling Actual Performance
In some cases, monetary damages are not an adequate remedy, particularly where the subject matter of the contract is genuinely unique, such as a specific piece of real property. In these circumstances, a court may order specific performance, compelling the breaching party to actually carry out their contractual obligations rather than simply paying compensation. This remedy is discretionary and not routinely granted, since courts are generally cautious about compelling ongoing performance rather than allowing a monetary resolution.
Rescission: Unwinding the Contract Entirely
Rescission is a remedy that unwinds a contract entirely, treating it as though it never existed, and requiring both parties to return anything already exchanged under it. This remedy is more commonly associated with situations involving misrepresentation, fraud, or a fundamentally void agreement, rather than a straightforward performance-related breach, though it remains a relevant option in certain circumstances.
Injunctions in the Context of Contract Breaches
Where a breach involves an ongoing or threatened action, such as a party about to breach a restrictive covenant or disclose confidential information, an injunction may be sought to prevent this from happening or continuing, either as an interim measure while the underlying dispute is resolved, or as part of the final outcome of the case.
The General Limitation Period for Contract Claims
For most breach of contract claims in Singapore, you generally have six years from the date the breach occurred to commence legal proceedings, under the Limitation Act. This is a genuinely important deadline, since once it passes, you generally lose the legal right to pursue your claim through the courts entirely, regardless of how strong the underlying case might otherwise have been.
When the Clock Actually Starts Running
The six-year period generally begins from the date of the breach itself, not from when you first became aware of it, which is an important distinction from some other types of claims where the clock only starts once the claimant has actual or reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. This makes it particularly important not to delay addressing a suspected breach once you become aware something may be wrong.
Exceptions That Can Extend the Limitation Period
The limitation period can be extended in certain circumstances, including where the breaching party concealed the breach through fraud, in which case the clock does not start until the fraud was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, or where a genuine mistake affected the claimant’s ability to bring the claim earlier.
Why Acting Promptly Matters Beyond Just the Legal Deadline
Even well within the six-year limitation period, delaying action after discovering a breach carries real practical risks: evidence can become harder to gather, witnesses’ memories fade, and the breaching party’s financial position may deteriorate, making eventual recovery harder even if you ultimately win your case. Acting reasonably promptly, rather than simply relying on having six years available, generally serves your interests considerably better.
Choosing the Right Remedy for Your Situation
Deciding which remedy to actually pursue depends heavily on what you genuinely want to achieve. If your priority is simply being made financially whole, damages are usually the appropriate and most readily available remedy. If you need the other party to actually do something only they can provide, such as transferring a specific property, specific performance may be worth exploring, despite being harder to obtain. Discussing your genuine goals honestly with a lawyer early helps ensure you pursue the remedy that actually serves your underlying interests, rather than defaulting to whichever option seems most familiar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a contract specify its own, different limitation period from the standard six years under Singapore law?
Contracts can sometimes include their own specific time limits for raising certain claims or disputes, so it is worth reviewing your specific contract’s terms carefully rather than assuming the general statutory limitation period automatically applies unmodified.
Does sending a Letter of Demand pause or extend the limitation period for a breach of contract claim?
No, simply sending a Letter of Demand for payment or performance does not itself extend the underlying limitation period, so it remains important to track the actual deadline separately from any informal attempts at resolution.
Can I claim for emotional distress or inconvenience caused by a breach of contract, or only financial losses?
Damages for breach of contract are generally focused on financial loss, and claims for emotional distress are typically much harder to succeed with in a contract context compared to certain other types of legal claims, though this can depend on the specific nature of the contract involved.
What happens if the other party breaches the contract but has no assets or money to pay damages?
Even a successful judgment for damages does not guarantee actual recovery if the breaching party genuinely lacks the means to pay, which is a practical risk worth considering when deciding how much time and cost to invest in pursuing a claim.
Is mediation a required step before bringing a breach of contract claim to court in Singapore?
This depends on the specific type and value of your claim and which court or tribunal it would proceed through, so it is worth checking the applicable pre-action requirements for your specific situation before filing.
Thank you for sharing this article...
About the Author: Randy Alta
